Dust and Water

Dust by Jay Owens and The Three Ages of Water by Peter Gleick.

Friends, I have recently read two books that have caused me to re-evaluate – in the words of Peter Gleick – the true value of water. The first book, Dust, considers the role of dust in human culture. And the second, The Three Ages of Water, describes the critical importance of fresh water for all life on Earth. Partly to help me recall the contents, I thought I would write a précis of the two books, and I hopefully you will find this of interest too.

Dust

Dust may seem an odd topic for a book, but it in fact dust is an intrinsic part of the natural world and plays an outsize role in many geophysical processes. As materials break down, they turn into small and smaller particles and at some point – below around about a tenth of a millimetre or so – we somehow lose consciousness of them as individual particles. But the materials are still there. Crucially, when not bound by water, particles of this size are small enough to be lifted by the wind and held aloft.

Jay Owens begins her assessment of the significance of dust in her own flat as she reflects on the astonishing amount of otherwise invisible dust made visible in the beams of sunlight. This is the start of a world-wide journey.

She first revisits the origin of the concept of ‘dusting’ – a task which arose from combination of the appalling particulate pollution from coal burning, and the development of consumer goods which needed to be displayed. She argues that the idea of household cleaning as “women’s work” led to the oppression of women throughout the 19th and 20th Centuries.

She visits Owen’s Valley, California where in the 1920’s entrepreneurs from Los Angeles acquired – through techniques of dubious legality – water rights that underpinned the growth of Los Angeles and led to the destruction of Owen’s lake, which became a source of toxic dust, and led to the desolation of a fertile valley. And she visits the land at the heart of the creation of the dustbowl in the US in the 1930’s.

Likewise she visits the Aral Sea where in the 1960’s soviet planners re-directed the sources that fed the Aral Sea in order to grow cotton. Since then the sea has all but disappeared, leading to toxic dust storms that have led to the desertification of a once fertile ecosystem.

Click on image for a larger version. USGS Landsat images of the Aral Sea in 1992 and 2020. Even in 1990 the sea, once the 4th largest freshwater lake on Earth, had already undergone significant contraction.

She visits the areas around atomic bomb test sites and investigates the lasting impact of the clouds of invisible radioactive dust that spread across the USA from the explosions.

Click on Image for a larger version. From the Downwinders Website, this graph shows the dose of radioactive Iodine -131 at locations across the US as a result of dust particles from atomic bomb tests.

And she visits Greenland to see the effect of particles of black carbon on the melting of the ice sheet.

Click on Image for a larger version. The upper image from the American Museum of Natural History shows a section of an ice core from the Greenland Ice sheet. The yearly bands are clearly visible. The lower graph shows analysis of such ice cores revealing the amount of black carbon dust deposited year by year over the last 800 years.

Throughout all her travels, Jay Owens emphasises the outsize role that tiny particles of dust play, and notes that somehow it always the less powerful groups in society that suffer. Although her writing is polemical at times, I feel that the book has nonetheless raised my consciousness of dust. Previously I had thought of dust as being incidental or peripheral, but in fact, if you look for it, dust is everywhere.

Water 

We all know that water is important, but Peter Gleick’s aim in writing this book is to urge is to see the true value of water.

In the first age of water, he discusses the role of water in the prehistory of the solar system, our planet, and the development of life, and leads us eventually to the critical role of water in the first civilisations that we know of, circa 5,000 BC.

What I had not fully appreciated is the profound extent to which control of water – via the construction of dams and irrigation structures – was at the base of all of the activities of these civilisations. And that loss of control – either via floods or drought or conflict – led to the collapse of societies, over and over again.

The second age of water – the age in which we are now living – is the age in which we ‘mastered’ fresh water. We can now control the flow of water from mountains to the sea, and we can ‘mine’ water from deep underground. And we know how to create potable water almost anywhere on Earth. And yet after perhaps 150 years of mastery, we find ourselves in a very difficult place.

Most critically, despite the UN declaring water to be a fundamental human right – with a nominal target of 50 litres per day – millions of people on Earth still lack basic facilities for drinking and hygiene.

Click on Image for a larger version. Based on weekly meter readings, the graph shows the household usage of water for myself and my wife is on average around 100 litres per person per day.

Additionally, and I don’t need to tell this to UK readers, many of our rivers and water courses are polluted to the point where ecosystems have been damaged.

Perhaps the defining feature of the second age of water is that we have treated water as being “ours” and considered any water which is not captured or used to be wasted or ‘lost’.

And worldwide we have mined “fossil” water collected in aquifers over thousands of years to create agricultural systems that have flourished for a few decades, but which are – literally – unsustainable. If we run out of almost any other substance, we can find a substitute, but there is no substitute for water.

The third age of water is the age which Gleick believes we are entering, and age in which we truly value water as the unique element around which all ecosystems are constructed. Some features of this age are:

  • Reduction of the amount of water that we use, domestically, industrially and agriculturally – but with no reduction in the utility we extract from the water.
  • Valuing potable water for the wonderful product that it is and using ‘grey’ water for many of the functions for which we currently use potable water.
  • Valuing the ecosystems within which all life exists, even to the point of giving rivers and ecosystems legal representation. Already, the US is removing dams to allow the slow re-building of natural water courses, and wetland restoration projects are underway world -wide.

I found the book by turns educational and inspiring. Although hearing of the phenomenal degradation left over from the second age of water, I feel that we have now universally accepted that it’s generally a bad thing when rivers catch fire. [Note added: Randy Newman wrote a song about one of the better known river fires]

As I was reading the book reports were unfolding of the appalling behaviour of Thames Water, the company that supplies my own water. And I was reminded that water is still of fundamental importance and that as in the civilisations of Early Mesopotamia, kingdoms could fail if water was not well-managed.

Water & Dust 

As regular readers will know, I am personally immersed in issues around our Climate Crisis. And I try to avoid becoming too involved in our other ongoing ecological crises – things can get very depressing! But together these books have raised my consciousness without getting me down too much. The Three Ages of Water in particular sets out a very positive and achievable agenda for change.

Tags: ,

11 Responses to “Dust and Water”

  1. Ross Mason Says:

    Hi Mike,

    I spent a year at Scott Base. Both of your subjects poked at my memory. Dust provided a mid-winter revelation, water provided a phase reality.

    Every winter night while the other nine bodies one shared the base slept, the House Mouse prowled the base on fire watch. Boring but it allowed the mind to wander.

    In Antarctica, fighting fires with liquid water is impossible. Thus the high population of (checked regularly) fire extinguishers around the place. The prowling is designed to detect the beast early.

    Dust. House Mouse had to clean the base. It delayed boredom. Forever emptying the Vacuum bag emphasized how much accumulates. I realized that it never disappears. All we do is shift it from one place to another. This revelation sent me to into gloom. Even in the Deep South of few dusty deserts, how could such quantities turn up on MY night?

    Since then, the least number of times we attempt to shift the stuff the better. I am much happier.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Ross,

      A pleasure to hear from you: and yes: the realities of water and dust are what we live with.

      Warmest best wishes

      Michael

  2. Jon Derricott Says:

    You might like to hear like Randy Newman’s tragicomic song about the Cayahoga river. I’ve always loved its entertaining madness.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDVIFVy1MXQ

    Jon

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Jon: Thanks for that: I had not heard of that song.

      I’ve corrected your typo and added a link in the original article.

      Best wishes: Michael

  3. Ian Nicholson Says:

    Michael I know this is serious but that was almost an elegiac post structuralist analysis.You have caught the beauty in despair. I do not consider either of us fortunate since we are involved in humanity. I welcome your voice.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Ian,

      Thank you for your kind words. “Elegiac” is what I am shooting for, but I rarely hit!

      I disagree with you about humanity. As I get older I like people more and more, and I think that both individually and collectively we are capable of great things. Also, people are enormously frustrating to work with – but that’s how it is.

      Warmest best wishes: Michael

  4. cclambie Says:

    Thanks so much for the beautiful summary of the content of the books. I amntorn between reading them for myself, or just being aware enough from tour post and the rest of the content I consume.

    I thought your comment about your focus on the climate change issues wasnan interesting one.
    I have had my CC focus come into question recently. I support the channel Our Changing Climate, and his rhetoric is one of anti capitalism, or fossil capital is why we have climate change. And I wholey agree.
    The rewards of capitalism do not point at a solution.
    In the book Ministry for the future, Kim Stanley Robinson imagines a world where we start to value the change via a special crypto coin that the central banks guarantee to pay.
    Is an interesting one.

    I wonder if it is possible to really change the climate direction without changing the fundamental political structure of western society?

    Some sort of socio capitilism? Or a more socialist regime?
    I don’t know politically what to call it, but we have to start valuing all of the earth as more than some resource we can exploit, but as a partnership that keeps us both alive.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Craig, thank you for your kind words.

      Regarding reading the books, reading a book is a strange activity and it feels odd these days to be sitting down and not clicking on something or following links: it’s become a kind of discipline to just sit still and engage with symbols on a page.

      Regarding the role of capitalism, I feel addressing the very specific needs of the climate crisis – basically stopping emitting carbon dioxide – is a much simpler problem than addressing the role of capitalism. I feel that our western democracies have been captured by the powerful forces of capital (Big Oil, Big Money etc) and they are no longer addressing the needs of people. And they are becoming increasingly incapable of incorporating ecological thinking into our policies. In contrast, authoritarian socio-capitalist countries such as China are able to act coherently to address the climate crisis by creating the wind, solar and battery infrastructure that the whole world needs. And that success is (I think) the result of mobilising capitalist profit-seeking within a very rigid social model.

      I avoid trying to proselytise for one view or another. I live in the UK: I doubt I’ll be moving in my lifetime: and I just advocate for taking very particular steps in the right direction rather than the wrong direction.

      Best wishes

      Michael

  5. Ian Nicholson Says:

    Clearly you never loved an Irish woman. It makes one hanker for climate change.That was one of my more unfortunate jokes. Your voice is welcome. Don’t get discouraged. Without voices everything is silence and complicity.

  6. Craig Stewart Says:

    Michael
    I have for some time been interested in the water subject.   Rather than “Data being the new Oil”,  a phrase common in my industry, my take is that “Water is the new Oil”.  Let me elaborate:  Water is a precious resource which is like oil historically, likely to become a resource over which wars are fought and lives lost.  Already access to water has been weaponised, particularly in the Middle East, and as I experienced when I lived in California for some years, it is certainly causing deadly conflict there.
    I am however encouraged at the emergence of the ‘air-to-water’ technologies being developed by some great scientists around the globe.  These to me could, with an abundance of renewable solar energy deliver every household their own water supply from the abundant humidity in the air.  In the same way that you and I are looking to reduce our carbon footprint, this is another area we should be investigating or at least keeping our eyes on.  (I live in an area where my water is supplied by one company and removed by Thames Water, the challenges there which could happen are frightening!
    Today here in the UK we have become used to paying what I assume is well below the true cost for our water provision.
    Good to keep an eye on this area.  Thanks again for your thoughts and keeping these subjects in the light.

    Craig

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Craig, Good Morning. If this is an area you are interested in, then I would encourage you to read Peter Gleick’s book.

      He outlines the first ‘water wars’ fought between the earliest civilisations, and water has been a potential and actual source of conflict ever since.

      Regarding, water harvesting from air, I have seen reports of this being carried out in very dry areas, and I guess there it is inevitable. But the “Third Age of Water” will hopefully operate on different principles. Perhaps most importantly Gleick emphasises the value that water has when it is *NOT* used by humans. Regarding water supply, in almost every circumstance it makes sense to supply water and treat waste-water collectively. The lesson of Thames Water is that privatisation is probably not the best model for societal benefits – but there are other structures which could work pretty well. But the fact that water infrastructure needs to paid for and the cost needs to be shared equitably – this kind of challenge is as old as civilisation itself.

      Best wishes: Michael

Leave a comment