Powerwall Battery Degradation: Winter#3

Friends, as you are no doubt all aware: everything is getting worse. But the other day I noticed that one thing in particular was not getting worse quite as quickly as I had expected: the nominal capacity of my Tesla Powerwall 2 battery.

The Tesla Powerwall 2: Capacity

The Tesla Powerwall 2 is a home battery with a nominal capacity of 13.5 kWh when new. However the capacity of all rechargeable batteries declines over time, and it can be quite difficult to assess the actual capacity of the battery in use. I wrote about this at the end of the winter of 2022/23 where I estimated that since the previous winter the battery capacity had fallen by about 3.5%. It’s only the start of the winter of 2023/24 but so far it looks like capacity has fallen by less than a further 1%.

Click on image for a larger version. Measurements over the last three winters showing the amount of electricity discharged from the battery as it goes from 100% full to empty within a single day. See the text for more details.

What do we mean by Battery Capacity?

Assessing the capacity of a battery while it is in use in a home is tricky. And one reason for that is that it is hard to define even what one means by ‘capacity’. Really? Allow me to explain.

The nominal capacity of the Tesla Powerwall 2 is 13.5 kWh, but the battery can only be charged from AC power with an efficiency of about 95%. And it can only be discharged with an efficiency of about 95%.

  • So to ‘fill’ the battery requires 14.2 kWh of AC electricity, 95% of which will be stored in the 13.5 kWh of battery cells, with the additional energy ending up as heat.
  • Similarly, when the battery is discharged at 95% efficiency, only 12.8 kWh of useful AC electricity will be produced.

In practice, I can only assess the capacity of the battery in winter on days when the battery is re-charged to 100% capacity overnight and then we run from the battery until it is drained again. In this way I can obtain a figure for the total energy discharged from the battery.

Click on image for a larger version. Four screenshots from the Tesla ‘App’ showing the complete discharge of the battery during the day. The lower section of each screen shows the battery state of charge. The upper section of each screen shows charging from the grid, discharging to meet the household load, and a few brief episodes of solar recharging.

One small complication arises from small amounts of solar generation during these winter days. If solar generation exceeds the household demand then the battery will start to re-charge (at 95% efficiency) and this extra charge will then discharge at 95% efficiency.  I only consider days in which this solar re-charging is small, and simply subtract it from the nominal capacity, but the simplest measurements to interpret are on those on dull days when there is no solar charging.

Click on image for a larger version. Measurements over the last three winters showing the amount of electricity discharged from the battery as it goes from 100% full to empty within a single day. See the text for more details. Each blue dot represents a single full-to-empty measurement. The large black circles show yearly averages and trends are shows as dotted lines.

The graph above (the same as the one at the head of the article) shows all the results since 2021. Each blue dot represents a day of full discharge. And each blue dot with a pink outer circle is day of full discharge in which there was no solar re-charging.

  • Based on the specification we might hope for a discharge of around 95% of the 13.5 kWh nominal capacity i.e. 12.8 kWh.
  • During the winter of 2021/22, the average daily discharge was 13.1 kWh – rather better than we might have hoped for.
  • During the winter of 2022/23, the average daily discharge was 12.7 kWh – a decline of 3.4% in one year.

This article is simply to mention the good news that:

  • So far, during the winter of 2023/24, the average daily discharge has been  12.6 ± 0.2 kWh – a decline of less than 1% since last year. Which is pleasing.

What should I expect?

If we extrapolate two trend-lines, one based on the decline in Years 1 & 2, and the other based on the decline in Years 2 & 3 (so far), then one trend line indicates a 20% decline in capacity over 6 years, and the other suggests a 20% loss in capacity after 20 years. My guess is that the answer will be somewhere in between the two.

Click on image for a larger version. Measurements over the last three winters showing the amount of electricity discharged from the battery as it goes from 100% full to empty within a single day. See the text for more details. Each blue dot represents a single full-to-empty measurement. The large black circles show yearly averages and trends are shows as dotted lines.

When I bought the battery I guessed that the battery degradation might be similar to that seen in early Tesla cars (Model S and X). This data (now 5 years old) is plotted versus kilometres travelled below.

Click on image for a larger version. 2018 data from Electrek showing battery capacity (%) for Tesla Model S and X cars versus kilometres travel. The trend indicates about 10% loss of capacity after 250,000 kilometres. Both graphs show the same data but the right-hand side ‘zooms in’ on the data.

The data shows two interesting things.

  • Firstly  it shows a relatively rapid decline in retained capacity in the first 20,000 km of life – perhaps the first year of typical use, followed by a lower rate of decline out to 250,000 km.
  • Secondly, there is a lot of variability in the data. This data is from 2018 and so would feature battery packs installed in perhaps 2012. Some batteries don’t seem to perform well at all. The cells in my Powerwall are still of this design type (so-called 2170 cells), but I suspect manufacturing quality has improved substantially since 2012.

However the battery packs (i.e. collections of battery cells) in a car battery and a domestic battery are subject to quite different duty cycles. Car batteries are only rarely filled to 100% or drained to 0 % and avoiding these extremes inhibits many of the physical processes which degrade the battery. In contrast, domestic batteries are frequently filled to 100% and emptied to 0%: this probably happens about 100 times each winter.

So we might think that a domestic battery pack will have a much tougher time than a car battery pack. However, the temperature at which charging and discharging take place is also important, and the Powerwall includes a heating and cooling system and with the battery pack in a semi-sheltered location in the UK, I would guess the cells experience less extreme temperatures during charging and discharging than an EV battery pack.

Summary

So to summarise,  the battery degradation observed so far this winter is less than I expected – and that is a good thing. I’ll be sure to write an update at the end of the winter.

6 Responses to “Powerwall Battery Degradation: Winter#3”

  1. cthombor Says:

    Hi Michael, thanks for posting this. It’s really good to have some carefully-curated real-world data on the Powerwall 2! Your methodology looks fine to me… but I’m wondering about how well it would cross-validate with other methods e.g. https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/battery-degradation-spreadsheet/ and other (very fragmentary!) data series e.g. the anecdotes at https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/powerwall-2-available-energy-after-2-years.228580/.

    Another point of comparison would be with the 20Ah NMC LCO pouch cell that was studied *very* carefully in Hoog, Appl Energy 200, 2017. Regrettably, that article is paywalled (don’t get me going about Elsevier’s profit margin 😉 at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.018. Hoog found significantly higher capacity losses at 35 degrees C than at 25 degrees C; although most of that advantage is lost to the cells at 25 degrees C if they’re deep-cycled (above 90% DoD), and the big “win” for the 25 degrees C case is when the duty cycle is less than 30% (and centred on 50% SoC). For example: the first 7% of capacity is lost after 2000 equivalent cycles at 80% DoD, and after 4000 equivalent cycles at 20% DoD. Curiously, the first 400 equivalent cycles are something of a “break-in period” for the cells — if they’re cycled gently enough they’ll gain a percent or two of capacity, and even if you treat them as roughly as in a Powerwall 2 (with its deep cycles) or in an EV (with its fast charges and discharges, and probably also some operation below 20 degrees C or above 30 degrees C) there’s not much capacity loss in those first 400 cycles. Highly non-linear! With so many important factors, and with so many $$$$ at stake to maintain “trade secrets”, it’s no wonder that there’s so much confusion about life-expectancy of batteries in EVs and domestic-scale battery energy storage systems.

    All to say (in my usual longwinded way) that I’m glad you’re posting your data. Your post ranks highly in my google-search on “powerwall 2 capacity degradation” but of course YMMV with such rankings, they’re even more nonlinear and subject to even more trade-secrecy than lithium battery life-expectancies 😉

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Clark, Good Afternoon,

      And thank you for your information-packed comment. I have looked through the links and the paper and I am slightly overwhelmed by the information. I have a couple of tentative conclusions in my head.

      As the Solar Quotes blogger points out, the definition of “full” and “empty” is critical to assessing “capacity”. It seems conventional to use a cell voltage of 4.2 V to define “full: and a voltage of 3.0 V to describe “empty” as they do in the paper. It seems that a manufacturer can adjust the these voltages to enhance longevity by restricting the operating range of the cell. And given the importance of operating temperature, I have probably been smart in placing the battery in the porch – so it doesn’t get too cold in winter. By exposing the Powerwall to minimal temperature excursions that probably minimises the work done by the heating and cooling unit and so minimises ‘phantom consumption’.

      Based on the results in the paper, it looks like the Powerwall is currently (around 900 days old) doing better than I might reasonably have expected!

      Anyway: I will keep measuring!

      Best wishes: Michael

  2. Geoff Chambers Says:

    Hi Michael
    Have a look at a Windows app called ‘Powerwall Companion’ – this app reports the Tesla values for battery degradation – my Powerwall is nearly 4 years old and showing 101% original capacity – so it appears that Tesla over spec the battery to allow for the initial drop?

    (And of great website and videos!)

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Geoff, Thanksfor that. I took a look and I couldn’t see how Powerful Companion defines battery health.

      Is it storage capacity? And if so is it how much energy it can store? Or how much energy it can discharge? Or an average?

      I would be very curious to know the details if you had any further information.

      Thanks

      Michael

      • geofchambers Says:

        Hi Michael, As Powerwalls have a warranty of 80% of the 13.5kWhr energy capacity after 10 years (for the UK) – the “% of warranted” value on the left pane (3rd tab down) will need to show at least 80% at 10 years from the “Install Date” If it falls below this then I guess we would have a claim!

        So to answer your question I would translate that as “Storage capacity”

        I have no idea how Tesla calculate the value. As I commented above I’m showing a capacity of 13.61kWh giving me 101% of the warranted capacity after nearly 4 years.

        Annoyingly I have no idea what the initial capacity value was at time of purchase so making any predications as to the degradation is impossible from this single point – but its going to be interesting data moving forward – at least as a supplement to your actual measurements!

        I now have automated the daily collection of the “Current capacity” – this is frustrating as I have been reading this data for about 18 months as part of my automation of the “Battery Reserve % value” based on the Solcast predication for the following day, but I wasn’t databasing this value!

        What is your Powerwall showing for “Current Capacity” , “% of warranted” and install date?

        Let us know what you think and for anyone else who has looked up these values – it would be interesting to see the data spread

      • protonsforbreakfast Says:

        Geof, Good Evening.

        In honesty, I am sceptical that your storage ‘capacity’ in the normal sense of the word is currently 13.61 kWh.

        If one measures the capacity to accept charging, then that is possible. Yesterday I charged my Powerwall with 13.7 kWh of energy, so in a sense that could be seen as its ‘capacity’. However when I discharged it, I only got 12.2 kWh back! I think this is the practical meaning of ‘capacity’: how much energy can one actually extract from a full battery.

        Even if you had not used the battery at all, batteries simply age with time and lose capacity. But if you have been using the battery for 4 years, it will *definitely* have degraded. It is just not physically possible for its capacity to have increased.

        I measure the performance based on the self-reported ability to *discharge* through a day when the Powerwall goes from full to empty, and battery experts have privately commented that my battery appears to be doing “pretty well”.

        So the question is: how does the app measures “capacity”? Is it based on ability to accept charge, or its ability to provide charge!? You should be able to work it out from the Tesla App.

        Best wishes for the New Year

        M

Leave a comment