Alarm Bells

Click on Image for a larger version. Clippings of articles in The Washington Post on 13th July 2023.

Friends, I am writing this just to record my shock and horror at the number of news stories of ever more extreme weather events. And we still have another 6 weeks of ‘summer’ in the Northern Hemisphere.

The clippings above are about weather events in the US, but there are also shocking heat waves in Europe and India.

And yet, there seems to be widespread indifference to what in my opinion is the loud and ominous ringing of alarm bells.

The news that a week in July was the hottest week on Earth for thousands of years, and that the month of June was the hottest month for thousands of years is treated as a curiosity.

It’s as if the increase in temperature of a sensor in a burning building were reported as being ‘anomalously high’ rather than triggering the fire alarm.

Click on Image for a larger version. Estimates of the daily surface air temperature across from the Copernicus climate monitoring system indicate that the week from the 3rd July to 9th July 2023 was the hottest on record and also likely the hottest for thousands of years.

Click on Image for a larger version. Estimates of the average monthly temperature from the Berkley Earth project indicate that  June 2023 was the hottest June on record, and also likely the hottest for thousands of years.

These extreme temperatures are significant not just for the current harm they cause.

What does not seem to be widely appreciated, is that even if humanity eventually achieves ‘net zero’, – something which is decades away on even the most optimistic assumptions – the Earth will not cool. And so what we are experiencing now will become commonplace for centuries to come.

Even if we reach net-zero, the Earth won’t cool.

Really? Even if we achieve ‘net zero’, the Earth will not cool? Yes, that’s our best estimate.

The reasons for this are not simple, but are discussed at length in this Carbon Brief summary. The article summarise the situation thus:

Moreover, temperatures are expected to remain steady rather than dropping for a few centuries after emissions reach zero, meaning that the climate change that has already occurred will be difficult to reverse in the absence of large-scale net negative emissions.

Why? It appears to be a balance of two opposing trends.

  • After net-zero, the continued absorption of atmospheric CO2 by the oceans and land will tend to reduce the atmospheric CO2 concentration, which would normally reduce average temperature.
  • However, most of the excess heating of Earth has taken place in the oceans, and the atmosphere has not yet reached equilibrium with the oceans. So after net-zero, the moderation of atmospheric  temperatures by the ocean will be less effective, and the atmosphere will warm slightly.

So very roughly, however hot we make the Earth, that’s it: Even if we then emit no carbon dioxide, the Earth won’t cool for a couple of hundred years.

Are you alarmed yet?

After reading these stories I half-expected to find people in the street shocked and stunned. But in fact, eavesdropping on tables in Teddington’s cafés today, I overheard people discussing ‘a week in Sicily‘ here,  ‘flights to New Zealand” there, and then driving off in cars the size of a small bus.

Last year the UK experienced wildfires and a temperature of 40 °C, but even these have not triggered a change of consciousness. Personally I find it a continuing challenge to avoid despair, and to keep focussing on how to prevent things getting less bad than they otherwise might.

Tags:

15 Responses to “Alarm Bells”

  1. rogercaiazza Says:

    Maybe it is because people instinctively thought it was excess hyperbole?

    That July 4th claim is false. It came from a website called climatereanalyzer.org using model data, not actual temperatures, and got picked up by know-nothing social media fools going viral, followed by the media that didn’t bother to check. Only two problems: it wasn’t an official temperature. In a July 5 Associated Press story, NOAA distanced itself:

    “NOAA, whose figures are considered the gold standard in climate data, said in a statement Thursday that it cannot validate the unofficial numbers. It noted that the reanalyzer uses model output data, which it called “not suitable” as substitutes for actual temperatures and climate records.”

    And there is the fact that the model only goes back to 1979, not “the history of humanity.”

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Roger, Good Evening,

      The data I presented in my short article came from:

      1. The Washington Post. This was reporting on current climate extremes in the US
      2. ESA. This was about extreme temperatures in Europe
      3. BBC. This was about last year’s extreme temperatures in the UK
      4. Berkeley Earth. This showed that June was the warmest June on record and thus likely the warmest June for thousands of years.
      5. The EU Copernicus programme. This showed that July 3-July 9 was the warmest week record and thus likely the warmest June for thousands of years.

      I suspect that source 5 is likely the result of reanalysis. It’s not the same as the standard meteorological method, but nonetheless it is still likely to be true. But even without source 5, the data are still alarming.

      The gist of your comment appears to be that the current situation is nothing to be alarmed about. Is that really your view?

      Best wishes

      Michael

  2. David Cawkwell Says:

    People need to be hit over head with a hammer before they think anything is wrong. I dont think even governments or policitians understand the severity of the situation or feel that the required changes cannot be implemented. Even our supposed net zero by 2050 in the UK is nonsense. The government think they can get away with it by offsetting the carbon. Carbon emissions continue to increase worldwide. Even a pandemic could only put a small dent in the emissions. It doesn’t look hopeful.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      David, Good Evening,

      Basically, Yes. I agree with you.

      That’s the challenge. How to maintain the impetus to action, because it is still possible for us to make things less bad than they might yet be.

      Best wishes

      Michael

  3. Guy Hargreaves Says:

    It’s pretty grim Michael but we mustn’t give up! Whether these are true records or not is a red herring – it’s perfectly obvious to open eyes and clear minds. Ocean temperatures of 37°C off Florida, monster wildfires, raging waters tossing cars around the likes I’ve rarely seem. I had lunch with a previously indifferent mate today who was finally asking all the right questions. He’s going to wake up one night in a cold sweaty realisation, as I’m sure many have, including myself over a decade ago – three decades late! We have to hang in and stop the heating by getting to net zero. Along the way we have to build an astronomical amount of renewable energy capacity and direct it towards negative emissions – as much as the mechanical engineer in me screams this can’t work. Markets won’t do this – I don’t think many really appreciate this is going to have to be a collective effort and the economic models of the past century are dead men walking!

  4. Phil Skone Says:

    I share your frustration, Michael. I’m sure that many of us experience similar widespread and baffling demonstrations of indifference. 75% of the population are worried about the climate crisis, but only a tiny proportion are engaged with it. The irony is that so many people don’t even want to think or talk about it! If the proportion of the population that was thinking and talking about it started to match that figure, we might start to see positive benefits. The media would start to cover it more regularly, perhaps even including it in soaps and dramas. It would be pushed to the very top of the political agenda, where it belongs. There would be regular rational, informed debates and discussions with climate experts. Political parties would then be falling over each other to come up with serious policies to deal with it.
    I believe that there may well be new ideas to help the planet that have never been shared. We are, after all, the most intelligent species on the planet (although sometimes that fact seems to be quite questionable). With 8 billion of us, it seems inconceivable that there aren’t any new ideas out there somewhere. These ideas may have been discussed in small social gatherings or just remain as an idea in an individual’s head. In 2020 I created a group with aim of trying to find these ideas; ‘Your Planet Saving Ideas’, https://www.facebook.com/groups/YourPlanetSavingIdeas/.
    You would be very welcome to join the group and post your blogs there.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Phil,

      Good afternoon. Thank you for your words of empathy.

      Like you, I agree that there will be solutions – there is already much to celebrate – but as I mentioned in the article, every year of delay is a year of extra temperature rise – 0.2 °C/decade – that will not reduced after net zero.

      I didn’t write about it in the article, but I fear that the higher the temperature, the greater the risk of a de-stabilisation of the system of causes and effects that we call the climate system.

      Well done on creating a focus your positivity. I would join but I have a diminished capacity to cope with social media and foresworn Facebook.

      I wish you all the best in your endeavours.

      Michael

  5. - Craig Lambie Says:

    […] reading several posts starting with Protons, and then Bill’s investigating further the news and statistics on the current state of the […]

  6. cclambie Says:

    Hey Michael,
    Thanks for your well timed post, and I want you to know it made a difference.
    I have taken action, in my own life, based on this post! I read more, I studied the stats, and saw the devastation too, but this started it!
    I cancelled my next overseas holiday, I told my friends and family why, and have taken a pledge as detailed on my website and posted on Socials as my “not going back on this”

    It is far to important, and all the work I have done until now is worthless (it feels like)
    Sometimes it feels like the Oil and Animal ag companies won.

    But, today I made a pledge to further reduce my impact by not flying for leisure for the next 7 years (as an Australian all flights are long haul)
    As per the https://takethejump.org/ pledge, I was holding out on the 6th one, but now I have officially taken the jump!

    Thanks for giving me the motivation to do it.
    And thanks for helping to pull that last bit of my head out of the sand – I can now fully help you and others pull heads from sand.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Craig,

      Good Evening, and thank your for your comment which, literally, moved me to tears.

      It is incredibly sad to foreswear the pleasures of international travel, but in the current context, I can’t see what else to do.

      Regarding holidays, our recent family holidays have been in Sussex and Kent and Yorkshire. And each reminds me what a beautiful and precious country we live in, and what a tiny fraction of it I have visited.

      Warmest best wishes

      Michael

      • cclambie Says:

        Thanks Michael. Great work on this and promoting everything electric!
        I can’t wait for my house to be fully electric. Had the gas meter removed within a month of buying it!
        Should be finished renovation in a few weeks.

  7. Andrew Says:

    And what, in the developed world, do you do if it’s too hot?
    Turn up the air conditioning.
    Can you spot something not quite right here?!

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Andrew, Good Evening.

      There is a high correlation between solar PV generation and the requirement for air conditioning.

      In our house, all the air conditioning is ‘free’ i.e. solar powered.

      Can you spot something very sweet here?

      M

    • cclambie Says:

      Even in the developed world people don’t have air conditioning… In the UK, in the USA… Even in the south. People are dying from heat exposure.
      The problem is equality really. If everyone had a nice insulated home with Solar and AC then we might not need to have this conversation.
      The billion odd people that live on the equator are already moving away from it (refugee crisis after crisis)
      This is mostly due to food security.
      You can’t turn the AC up on the crops.

Leave a comment