“News-ertaintment”? No Thanks.

Why isn't BBC news distinctly different from other News Web sites?

Why isn’t BBC news distinctly different from other News web sites?

I love the BBC. I read the News web site and listen to Radio 4 every day. Occasionally I watch the Television news. I am really proud that our collectively-owned broadcaster is as good as it is. But I think that – freed from the need to make money – the BBC News service should be even better. For example:

  • Speculation is not news. If a report is going to be released on a certain date, it is not ‘news’ until after it has been published. Having people discuss what reports might contain when they are eventually published is not news. It is ‘News-ertainment’.
  • News is numbers. When reporting about Fukushima, I want to know the numbers. I want to know what the radiation levels are in rational units – in this case dose rate in micro-seiverts per hour, or the number of becquerels of activity in the soil. These numbers are the news. Some people won’t understand the numbers, but others will. Terms like ‘high’ and ‘low’ are meaningless, and pictures of people in special suits are not news.
  • Cross-Promotion: The BBC is in the habit of believing that its own programmes are news. So that what is apparently a ‘news’ story on a web site or TV report, will in reality be nothing more than promotion of other BBC output. This is fine for commercial web sites – I am not paying for them – but the BBC should not do this.
  • Corrections. When good news sites make a correction to a story – they note that a correction has been made. This is common practice at The Guardian or the LA Times. But it is not practiced at the BBC who change stories – but leave no record that they ever got anything wrong in the first place.

The BBC Trust is holding a consultation on BBC News so if you have anything you want to say, now would be the time to speak up.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

One Response to ““News-ertaintment”? No Thanks.”

  1. James Says:

    Part of the job of reporters/correspondants is to interpret the news and its future effects. So the BBC presumably employ many experts in speculation. If they can also predict accurately what the news is going to be isn’t that a valuable service? Sounds like the type of thing that you could write a paper on (that would presumably be reported in the news-ertainment too) – Is the ability of BBC journalists to predict the news distinguishable from random guessing or random members of the public’s guesses?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: