What could possibly go wrong?

The recovered tail fin of flight AF447. The fully-functioning aircraft was flown into the sea killing all on board. There are lessons to learned for other safety critical control systems. Picture Courtesy of Wikipedia

The recovered tail fin of flight AF447. The fully-functioning aircraft was flown into the sea killing all on board. There are lessons to be learned for other safety-critical control systems. Picture courtesy of Wikipedia

On June 1st 2009, a well-trained crew flew a fully-functioning state-of-the-art aircraft into the atlantic ocean, killing all on board. It took less than 5 minutes to go from cruising at altitude to crashing into the sea. At enormous expense and against all odds, the French government recovered the flight voice and data recorders and now we know what happened. As one reads the account of the last few minutes of the flight it is difficult to fathom how the pilots could behave as they did. But the essential element appears to have been tragically simple – the crew were confused.

The confusion appears to have arisen at the interface between automatic and manual control of the aeroplane. As the crew took manual control, they didn’t know which instruments to believe and so – time after time – and in the face of the repeated warnings – the crew made exactly the wrong decisions. This is a tragedy in itself, but I think there is a wider lesson to be learned. Imagine, if you will, that the crew were not flying an aeroplane but running a nuclear power station.

The level of safety criticality of systems for nuclear power stations and aeroplanes, while not the same, is of the same order. People exhaustively plan out all possible routes to catastrophe, and then block these routes by a combination of methods involving hardware, software and procedural training. However, the lesson of Flight AF447 is that there is always a risk of catastrophe, even with well-trained highly-motivated crew and perfectly functional hardware. If controllers are confused, then they can make the wrong decisions.

One solution is to have control systems for aircraft and power stations which are driven by software with no human override. This would avoid mistakes arising from confusion and panic. It would also be cheaper since there would be less need for highly trained staff. What could possibly go wrong?

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: