What’s the story?

We also interpret events in our life as being part of a narrative. But many different stories can fit the same facts. However the story we really believe in determines our actions.

We all interpret events as being part of a narrative. But many different stories can fit the same facts. However the story we really believe in determines our actions.

Are you sitting comfortably…

While visiting NASA I bought a book “How NASA builds teams” by Charlie Pellerin. I was struck by the fact the author was the project manager of the team which launched the Hubble Space Telescope with its flawed mirror. And also the man who managed the project which launched the correction mission. I thought this experience must surely have delivered some enlightenment. Youtube has an interview here.

One part of the book has had a profound effect on me: the discussion of the ‘story lines’ we believe about ourselves and others. In the book Charlie Pellerin uses this idea to discusses the shared beliefs that one team holds about another team, and how these beliefs can hinder or help partnerships. But, it is not the role of this idea in industrial relations or project management which interests me.

Gore Vidal has expressed the view that ‘the story’ is the fundamental mode of human knowledge. When I first heard this I thought it was nonsense, but now I firmly believe it to be true. Vidal spoke about how for many millennia before written texts, humans told each other stories in which were embedded a mixture of factual and cultural knowledge. Indeed entire cultures would once have been transmitted orally as stories. As a result, we have evolved to both remember even long stories, and to grasp their ‘the gist’. Consider how easy it is to remember long stories where each step follows easily from the preceding step. In contrast, lists of un-connected facts are almost un-memorisable.

The concept of ‘story as mode of knowledge‘ is very appropriate to scientific explanations, where out of a mountain of data we want to find out ‘what’s happening’ – what is the (hopefully simple) ‘story’ which makes sense of all the facts. Once we know ‘the story’, we feel that we understand the phenomenon and the data then just become a story-teller’s embellishments.

At Universities’, the basic plan for communication is really nothing more than collective story-telling: we call the key events ‘lectures’. But students ache for lecturers who will tell them ‘the story’ that makes sense of the facts of their particular subject. A dull lecturer is one who recites the facts but omits the connecting narrative.

And in our own lives, the idea that ‘something is happening’ is essential for mental health. It is important to believe that our lives are part of an evolving narrative – a bigger story. Fracturing that belief can be personally devastating, and not knowing the significance of the events of one’s life can lead to depression and even death. In contrast, belief that the story of our life is meaningful can transform a person’s experience of even objectively difficult circumstances.

So I think Charlie Pellerin, is onto something in seeking to understand and challenge the stories we believe about ourself and others. So good luck to him. The book caused me to reflect on my own life and make me wonder: What is the story line that ‘makes sense’ of my life? Like most people, I feel too busy just living my life to pause to consider that question. But I hope it’s a good story, and that, despite all the odds, it has a happy ending. Sweet dreams.

About these ads

Tags: ,

7 Responses to “What’s the story?”

  1. Steve McGann Says:

    Hi Michael,

    Alice Bell has posted some interesting thoughts about science communication as public advocacy here –

    http://alicerosebell.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/who-speaks-for-the-trees/

    – to which I added a few comments which seem to chime with your thoughts about narrative above.

    I love the observation about story being a vessel for meaning, and particularly a ‘mode of knowledge.’

    Regards

    Steve

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Thanks Steve, I followed the link and enjoyed the article. I can now identify myself as being an advocate for trees. And rocks. And gases. I want to speak up for the inarticulate matter whose perfection is so routinely unnoticed. Remember: protons are people too.

      Thanks again: M

  2. Mel Says:

    Interesting. The value of ‘knowledge as stories’ has cropped up (briefly) before – PFB, November 2009, in a comment:

    “The story-teller is an important part of the mix, too. When I tell a story, like Red Riding Hood, for example, I’m not above putting on a gruff voice for the wolf and trying out a squeaky one for Grandma. Even though it conforms to a stereotype, the audience expects it and it helps them to see that I know a bit about the story. Perhaps we shouldn’t be too worried if personalities and arcana are used as props to help to keep the crowd’s attention and, perhaps, to get them to scratch their heads a little after the story’s ended.”

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Good Point. One of the hardest things is to think about things we don’t understand. When we try we constantly feel the need to think about something else! If celebrity, drama, music or sport enables people to bring difficult ideas to mind, focus on them, and grasp the gist of the story, I am all in favour of it.

  3. Mark Linsenbardt Says:

    Nearly all the personal growth seminars and companies that do trainings and coaching have discussed the difference between your “story” and your reality. I maintain that we have become creatures that think in story, and that we actually seek to make sense of the story so much, that we create drama to make sure that the three roles of a good story (good guy, bad guy, victim) are present in everything.

    I have to agree from the onset, it was a very good book, and I have recommended it over and over again to friends.

    • protonsforbreakfast Says:

      Thank you Mark. I had not come across the idea that a good story should have the three characters: good guy, bad buy, victim. But now that you say it, it seems obvious and I realise I use that categorisation a lot in my ‘storytelling. All the best. Michael

  4. To Die For A Story: The 9/11 Cult, The Obama Cult, And The Usurpation of Reality | Independent News Hub Says:

    […] embellishments.” – From the blog, “Protons for Breakfast Blog,” in a post called, “What’s the story?” Date: October 14, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 538 other followers

%d bloggers like this: